Announcements


12.Jun.26Ladas & Parry LLP is pleased to announce that Lanning Bryer, Ralph Cathcart, Sebastian Lovera...

08.Jun.26In a unanimous decision of June 4, 2026 in Hikma Pharmaceutical USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma Inc.,...

23.Apr.26Ladas & Parry was pleased to highlight a series of speaking engagements and industry events...

16.Apr.26Ladas & Parry partners Dennis Prahl, and Bharati Baskhani attended the INTA 2026 Annual...

View all Announcements »


ladas-brochure-download

  • In this case, which was decided on August 1, 2003, the Federal Circuit again addressed the question of anticipation by virtue of what was inherent in the prior...

    Details Share b
  • This case saw a return to the question of what is meant by 35 USC 112 paragraph 6 which has been troubling the Federal Circuit and practitioners for much of the past...

    Details Share b
  • In re Peterson involved an appeal from the USPTO Board of Appeals with respect to the patentability of the claims of a pending US patent...

    Details Share b
  • This is a complex case involving a non-naturally occurring erythropoietin-glycoprotein product having a defined in vivo biological activity and having glycosylation which differs from that of human urinary...

    Details Share b
  • This was a Paragraph IV certification case filed after Novopharm filed an ANDA to market a generic form of fenofibrate prior to expiration of the relevant...

    Details Share b
  • The invention related to the isolation of the virus that caused “Mystery swine disease” (a.k.a Porcine Reproductive Respiratory Syndrome – PRRS). The claim was directed to growing and isolating a particular virus. The alleged infringement...

    Details Share b