Announcements


22.Sep.26John Richards, Of Counsel at Ladas & Parry LLP’s New York Office, has published a new article...

22.Sep.26Ladas & Parry LLP is pleased to announce that Dennis S. Prahl, Partner in the firm’s New...

21.Sep.26Ladas & Parry Partner Dennis Prahl and Of Counsel Diane Meyers will attend the 2026 IPO Annual...

01.Sep.26 Ladas & Parry LLP is pleased to announce that David C. Brezina, Of Counsel in the firm’s...

View all Announcements »


ladas-brochure-download

  • In this case, which was decided on August 1, 2003, the Federal Circuit again addressed the question of anticipation by virtue of what was inherent in the prior...

    Details Share b
  • This case saw a return to the question of what is meant by 35 USC 112 paragraph 6 which has been troubling the Federal Circuit and practitioners for much of the past...

    Details Share b
  • In re Peterson involved an appeal from the USPTO Board of Appeals with respect to the patentability of the claims of a pending US patent...

    Details Share b
  • This is a complex case involving a non-naturally occurring erythropoietin-glycoprotein product having a defined in vivo biological activity and having glycosylation which differs from that of human urinary...

    Details Share b
  • This was a Paragraph IV certification case filed after Novopharm filed an ANDA to market a generic form of fenofibrate prior to expiration of the relevant...

    Details Share b
  • The invention related to the isolation of the virus that caused “Mystery swine disease” (a.k.a Porcine Reproductive Respiratory Syndrome – PRRS). The claim was directed to growing and isolating a particular virus. The alleged infringement...

    Details Share b