This case saw a return to the question of what is meant by 35 USC 112 paragraph 6 which has been troubling the Federal Circuit and practitioners for much of the past...
Details Share bIt will be recalled that in determining damages to be awarded for patent infringement, the basic test is one of lost profits and that the normal, but not exclusive, test to apply in addressing the issue of lost profits based on lost sales was set...
Details Share bIn re Peterson involved an appeal from the USPTO Board of Appeals with respect to the patentability of the claims of a pending US patent...
Details Share bThis is a complex case involving a non-naturally occurring erythropoietin-glycoprotein product having a defined in vivo biological activity and having glycosylation which differs from that of human urinary...
Details Share bThis was a Paragraph IV certification case filed after Novopharm filed an ANDA to market a generic form of fenofibrate prior to expiration of the relevant...
Details Share bThe invention related to the isolation of the virus that caused “Mystery swine disease” (a.k.a Porcine Reproductive Respiratory Syndrome – PRRS). The claim was directed to growing and isolating a particular virus. The alleged infringement...
Details Share b