News
Practices: , , , , , , , | Categories: , , , ,

LADAS ATTORNEY DISCUSSED CHANGES IN INTERNATIONAL IP AT THE CHICAGO BAR ASSOCIATION

Ladas attorney Kevin Thompson recently gave a talk entitled, “Pitfalls in International IP and March 2019 Law Update,” in which he gave an overview of upcoming changes to intellectual property law and practice in the UK and EU as a result of...

Read Article
News
Practices: , | Categories: ,

SCOTUS HOLDS LARGE COPYRIGHT COSTS AWARD IN RIMINI STREET V. ORACLE IS NOT PERMISSIBLE

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States overturned the decision of the Ninth Circuit Court in Rimini Street, Inc. et al v. Oracle USA, Inc. et al to award damages for costs in the amount of $12.8 million in a copyright infringement law suit....

Read Article
News
Practices: , | Categories: ,

SCOTUS HOLDS A COPYRIGHT MUST BE REGISTERED BEFORE THE OWNER OF THE COPYRIGHT CAN SUE FOR INFRINGEMENT

Today, the Supreme Court held in Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Sreet.com, LLC et al., that before a party can file suit for copyright infringement, the copyright must be registered with the U.S. Copyright Office. Absent statutory...

Read Article
News
Practices: , , , , | Categories: , , , , ,

DENNIS PRAHL, RALPH CATHCART AND LANNING BRYER HAVE BEEN SELECTED AS WORLD’S LEADING TRADEMARK PROFESSIONALS IN THE 2019 EDITION OF THE WTR 1000

The World Trademark Review described Ladas & Parry as being known to fortune 500 companies, small and midsized companies as well as multinational organizations as having “superior trademark service” and that these companies use Ladas because...

Read Article
Education Center
Author: John Richards | Practices: , | Tags: , , , ,

Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc: Prior Public Sale may destroy novelty without disclosure of inventive feature

In Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, the United States Supreme Court held that a prior public sale of a patented product could destroy the novelty of a patent for that product even though there was no disclosure of the...

Read Article
News
Practices: , | Categories: ,

SCOTUS DECIDES TO HEAR IANCU v. BRUNETTI REGARDING ‘OFFENSIVE’ WORD AS A TRADEMARK

The U.S. Supreme Court decided today to hear the case of Iancu v. Brunetti regarding the possibility that the Lanham Act violates a fashion designer’s freedom of speech in preventing him from registering the trademark for the term...

Read Article