Announcements


12.Jun.26Ladas & Parry LLP is pleased to announce that Lanning Bryer, Ralph Cathcart, Sebastian Lovera...

08.Jun.26In a unanimous decision of June 4, 2026 in Hikma Pharmaceutical USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma Inc.,...

23.Apr.26Ladas & Parry was pleased to highlight a series of speaking engagements and industry events...

16.Apr.26Ladas & Parry partners Dennis Prahl, and Bharati Baskhani attended the INTA 2026 Annual...

View all Announcements »


ladas-brochure-download

  • In March 2009, we reported that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had issued a decision in the case of Tafas v. Doll (formerly, Tafas v. Dudas). Subsequent to that decision, the Federal Circuit granted a rehearing en banc, and...

    Details Share b
  • In its decision in In re Bilski, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals held that a claim to a process only sets out patent-eligible subject matter if the claim requires use of a particular machine or involved a transformation of something to a...

    Details Share b
  • The primary focus has been in the “mental steps” area, although early in the year the Federal Circuit refused to reconsider its 2007 decision that a disembodied signal did not qualify for patent protection as a...

    Details Share b
  • U.S. Patent Rules (see 7 CFR 1.137) permit abandoned patent applications to be revived if the applicant asserts that the abandonment was either unintentional or makes a showing that abandonment was...

    Details Share b
  • It was hoped that the Supreme Court might resolve this controversy when it decided the case of Quanta Computer Inc. v. L.G. Electronics. Unfortunately although its decision of June 8, 2008 made it clear that the Court of Appeals for the Federal...

    Details Share b
  • ...

    Details Share b