Announcements


30.Apr.25An article by John Richards about the recent decisions of the Court of Appeals of the Federal...

23.Apr.25L&P attorney David Brezina has been appointed to serve as a member of the ISBA Intellectual...

15.Apr.25On May 13, 2025, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will expedite Issue Dates for...

08.Apr.25Ladas & Parry attorney John Richards will serve as a moderator and a speaker during the 32nd...

View all Announcements »


ladas-brochure-download

  • Dennis Prahl’s article entitled, “California District Court Puts Baby in a Corner,”  reminds that federal trademark infringement claims may be preempted by claims under U.S. copyright...

    Details Share b
  • In a 10 – 2  decision, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit en banc this morning decided Lexmark v. Impression, holding that when a product is sold subject to  a lawful re-sale or use restriction, this restriction is effective to prevent...

    Details Share b
  • The Eastern District of Virginia followed the TTAB’s finding of fraud in Nationstar Mortgage, LLC. v. Mujahid Ahmad and Nationstar Mortgage, Inc., as reported at https://ladasparry.wpengine.com/news/nationstar-mortgage-v-ahmad-fraud-uspto-alive/,...

    Details Share b
  • The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held in In Re Simon Shiao Tam today that the Lanham’s Act’s proscription of disparaging trademarks is unconstitutional because the government has no legitimate interest in banning even hurtful...

    Details Share b
  • Following the holding of the U.S. Supreme Court that decisions of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) can have preclusive effect, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals determined that the ordinary...

    Details Share b
  • In Akamai v. Limelight, The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled en banc that a method claim in a patent may be infringed by multiple...

    Details Share b